GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010Core: 650 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 10581.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 172541.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10581.6% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 143671.4% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 7), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 172541.2% (40.4 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 143671.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
G3D Mark Score
10,064+143671%
7
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi
Process Node
16 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2560+789%
288
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+1085%
0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+233%
48
L1 Cache
960 KB+150%
384 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
DirectX
12+48%
8.1
Vulkan
1.3
None
OpenGL
4.5+246%
1.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs No.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
No
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
No
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
TDP
180W
150W-17%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
216mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 16.7% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP
$249-17%
$299
Performance per Dollar
40.4
0.0
Codename
GP104
GF104
Release
May 27 2016
November 15 2010
Ranking
#137
#683

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.