
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+83% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅+83% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 5,500 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 83%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+83% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+63900% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1950 MHz+13% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 169.2% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 366.7+556% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 17% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 18.3 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 120.8% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+121% | 18.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | May 27 2016 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #496 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














