GeForce GTX 1060 vs GRID K160Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GRID K160Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GRID K160Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+1502.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 704.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅GRID K160Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1502.5% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 628), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $124 more expensive on MSRP at $249 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 704.5% (40.4 vs 5.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs GRID K160Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GRID K160Q's 628 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 1502.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GRID K160Q
G3D Mark Score	10,064+1503%	628
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+67%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+288%	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+25%	128
L1 Cache	960 KB+650%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K160Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GRID K160Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the GRID K160Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GRID K160Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GRID K160Q
TDP	180W-20%	225W
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	55.9+1896%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125. On MSRP, GRID K160Q was 49.8% cheaper ($124 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.0 (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 708% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	GRID K160Q
MSRP	$249	$125-50%
Performance per Dollar	40.4+708%	5.0
Codename	GP104	GK104
Release	May 27 2016	June 28 2013
Ranking	#137	#589

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search GRID K160Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.