
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+127.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1725.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P6-4Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P6-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
GRID P6-4Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,429 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GRID P6-4Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅+127.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1725.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P6-4Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P6-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,429 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GRID P6-4Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P6-4Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GRID P6-4Q

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID P6-4Q
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GRID P6-4Q's 4,429 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 127.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+127% | 4,429 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+300% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+67% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+67% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P6-4Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-4Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+26% | 44.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 87.5% less ($1751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1736.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID P6-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1736% | 2.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













