
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,050 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1917.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,617).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅+25.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2429.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GRID RTX6000-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,050 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1917.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+25.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,617).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2429.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID RTX6000-1Q better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than GRID RTX6000-1Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 33 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 57 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GRID RTX6000-1Q

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID RTX6000-1Q
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 12,617 — the GRID RTX6000-1Q leads by 25.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GRID RTX6000-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,617+25% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+84% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+47% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q has 8 GB. The GRID RTX6000-1Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 225W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-20% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 56.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 96% less ($6050 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1920% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GRID RTX6000-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1920% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













