
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌52.6% HIGHER MSRP$380 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌52.6% HIGHER MSRP$380 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Intel Arc Pro A60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro A60 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Intel Arc Pro A60

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel Arc Pro A60
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 9,493 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+6% | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+6% | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2050 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 32.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 130W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 73.0+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 34.5% less ($131 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 61.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-34% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+62% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | DG2-256 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













