
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,208).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅+21.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 173mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌40.2% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+21.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 173mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,208).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌40.2% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Intel Arc Pro B50 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the Intel Arc Pro B50 leads by 21.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2600 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,208+21% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2600 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB. The Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 88% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 174.4+212% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 28.7% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 15.4% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-29% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+15% | 35.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













