
GeForce GTX 1060

Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+643.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,353 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Iris Plus Graphics 640
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 640's 1,353 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 643.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses Generation 9.5, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+644% | 1,353 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 2560+567% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+950% | 0.8448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+58% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+967% | 6 |
| TMUs | 160+233% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 640's 15W — a 169.2% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | None |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 90.2+61% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Iris Plus Graphics 640 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 640 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #767 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















