
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- β +462.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 950: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 10,064).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- β +462.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 950: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 10,064).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Iris Plus Graphics 950?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Plus Graphics 950 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 20 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 20 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 1,789 β the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 462.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 16 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+463% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+400% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+767% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 160+400% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W β a 169.2% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 173mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | β | 85Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 119.3+113% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) β the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP104 | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #137 | #634 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













