GeForce GTX 1060 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • βœ…+462.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 950: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 10,064).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Very weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Iris Plus Graphics 950?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 1,789 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a 0 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 0, 462.5% more raw performance headroom, and more VRAM at 6 GB instead of Unknown. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 462.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Iris Plus Graphics 950 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Iris Plus Graphics 950 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low117 FPS43 FPS
medium105 FPS30 FPS
high91 FPS21 FPS
ultra77 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS34 FPS
medium87 FPS21 FPS
high76 FPS11 FPS
ultra67 FPS6 FPS
4K
low55 FPS11 FPS
medium49 FPS7 FPS
high41 FPS4 FPS
ultra37 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low216 FPS76 FPS
medium181 FPS49 FPS
high148 FPS33 FPS
ultra113 FPS23 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS48 FPS
medium107 FPS26 FPS
high87 FPS19 FPS
ultra68 FPS14 FPS
4K
low62 FPS23 FPS
medium51 FPS14 FPS
high49 FPS11 FPS
ultra41 FPS8 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low453 FPS81 FPS
medium362 FPS64 FPS
high302 FPS54 FPS
ultra226 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS60 FPS
medium272 FPS48 FPS
high226 FPS40 FPS
ultra170 FPS30 FPS
4K
low226 FPS40 FPS
medium181 FPS32 FPS
high151 FPS27 FPS
ultra113 FPS20 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
1080p
low358 FPS81 FPS
medium302 FPS64 FPS
high260 FPS54 FPS
ultra226 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS60 FPS
medium254 FPS48 FPS
high208 FPS40 FPS
ultra170 FPS30 FPS
4K
low170 FPS40 FPS
medium133 FPS32 FPS
high123 FPS27 FPS
ultra102 FPS20 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Iris Plus Graphics 950

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 1,789 β€” the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 462.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 16 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score
10,064+463%
1,789
Architecture
Pascal
Generation 11.0
Process Node
16 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
2560+400%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+767%
1.024 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+73%
1000 MHz
ROPs
64+700%
8
TMUs
160+400%
32
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
System
Bus Width
192-bit
System
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
Quick Sync 7
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
Quick Sync 7
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W β€” a 169.2% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
TDP
180W
15W-92%
Recommended PSU
400W
1W-100%
Power Connector
6-pin
Integrated
Length
173mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
β€”
85Β°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
119.3+113%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) β€” the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Iris Plus Graphics 950
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
40.4
Infinity
Codename
GP104
Ice Lake GT2
Release
May 27 2016
sem dados
Ranking
#137
#634