
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

L40S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1413.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 20,023).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅+99% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2912% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016L40S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1413.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+99% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 20,023).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2912% HIGHER MSRP$7,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is L40S better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 901 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 721 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 225 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 117 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and L40S

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

L40S
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the L40S's 20,023 — the L40S leads by 99%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the L40S uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 18,176 (L40S). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 20,023+99% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 18176+610% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 91.61 TFLOPS+932% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2520 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 64 | 192+200% |
| TMUs | 160 | 568+255% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 17.8 MB+1794% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L40S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the L40S has 48 GB. The L40S offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 960 GB/s (L40S) — a 400% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 48 MB (L40S) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 960 GB/s+400% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (L40S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L40S). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the L40S's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 800W (L40S). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-40% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-50% | 800W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 66.7+19% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the L40S launched at $7500. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 96.7% less ($7251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.7 (L40S) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1396.3% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | L40S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-97% | $7500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1396% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GP104 | AD102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 13 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #76 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













