
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- β +101.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 10,064).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β +101.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 10,064).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than M1 8-Core GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does M1 8-Core GPU make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 5,000 β the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 101.3%. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+101% | 5,000 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+31900% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The M1 8-Core GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the M1 8-Core GPU has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) β a 182.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+182% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5+10% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W β a 142.9% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 30W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 166.7+198% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) β the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The M1 8-Core GPU is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP104 | β |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #137 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













