GeForce GTX 1060 vs NVS 310

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

NVS 310

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +3559.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 2236.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than NVS 310: it remains the more sensible modern option while NVS 310 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 164.7% higher power demand at 180W vs 68W.
  • 19.3% longer card at 173mm vs 145mm.

NVS 310

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $90 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Draws 68W instead of 180W, a 112W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 173mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (275 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than NVS 310?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 275 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while NVS 310 is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015, 3559.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 56.6% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 3559.6% higher G3D Mark. NVS 310 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is NVS 310 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. NVS 310 is 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 275 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
1080p
low117 FPS12 FPS
medium105 FPS10 FPS
high91 FPS8 FPS
ultra77 FPS5 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS9 FPS
medium87 FPS7 FPS
high76 FPS3 FPS
ultra67 FPS2 FPS
4K
low55 FPS5 FPS
medium49 FPS3 FPS
high41 FPS1 FPS
ultra37 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
1080p
low216 FPS12 FPS
medium181 FPS10 FPS
high148 FPS8 FPS
ultra113 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS9 FPS
medium107 FPS7 FPS
high87 FPS6 FPS
ultra68 FPS5 FPS
4K
low62 FPS6 FPS
medium51 FPS3 FPS
high49 FPS3 FPS
ultra41 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
1080p
low453 FPS12 FPS
medium362 FPS10 FPS
high302 FPS8 FPS
ultra226 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS9 FPS
medium272 FPS7 FPS
high226 FPS6 FPS
ultra170 FPS5 FPS
4K
low226 FPS6 FPS
medium181 FPS5 FPS
high151 FPS4 FPS
ultra113 FPS3 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
1080p
low358 FPS12 FPS
medium302 FPS10 FPS
high260 FPS8 FPS
ultra226 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS9 FPS
medium254 FPS7 FPS
high208 FPS6 FPS
ultra170 FPS5 FPS
4K
low170 FPS6 FPS
medium133 FPS5 FPS
high123 FPS4 FPS
ultra102 FPS3 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and NVS 310

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

NVS 310

The NVS 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the NVS 310's 275 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 3559.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the NVS 310 uses Maxwell, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 (NVS 310). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 310). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
G3D Mark Score
10,064+3560%
275
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+400%
512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+739%
1.058 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+68%
1033 MHz
ROPs
64+300%
16 ×2
TMUs
160+400%
32 ×2
L1 Cache
960 KB+275%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The NVS 310 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 310 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (NVS 310) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 310). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Fermi NVENC (NVS 310). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (NVS 310).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
Fermi NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
VP4
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the NVS 310's 68W — a 90.3% difference. The NVS 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (NVS 310). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
TDP
180W
68W-62%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
145mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+1298%
4.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the NVS 310 launched at $159. The NVS 310 costs 36.1% less ($90 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.7 (NVS 310) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 2276.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060NVS 310
MSRP
$249
$159-36%
Performance per Dollar
40.4+2276%
1.7
Codename
GP104
GM107
Release
May 27 2016
November 4 2015
Ranking
#137
#826