
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

NVS 810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+744.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2273.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than NVS 810: it remains the more sensible modern option while NVS 810 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌164.7% higher power demand at 180W vs 68W.
NVS 810
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 180W, a 112W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,192 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌181.1% HIGHER MSRP$700 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016NVS 810
2015Why buy it
- ✅+744.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2273.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than NVS 810: it remains the more sensible modern option while NVS 810 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 180W, a 112W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌164.7% higher power demand at 180W vs 68W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,192 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌181.1% HIGHER MSRP$700 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than NVS 810?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is NVS 810 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and NVS 810

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVS 810
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the NVS 810's 1,192 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 744.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+744% | 1,192 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+400% | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+739% | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+68% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160+400% | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+275% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The NVS 810 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 90.3% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 198mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 68W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 198mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+219% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the NVS 810 launched at $700. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 64.4% less ($451 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.7 (NVS 810) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 2276.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-64% | $700 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+2276% | 1.7 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM107 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













