
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

P106-090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+308.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 537.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than P106-090: it remains the more sensible modern option while P106-090 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
P106-090
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,466 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌56.2% HIGHER MSRP$389 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($389 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016P106-090
2017Why buy it
- ✅+308.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 537.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than P106-090: it remains the more sensible modern option while P106-090 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,466 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌56.2% HIGHER MSRP$389 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($389 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than P106-090?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does P106-090 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 28 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and P106-090

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

P106-090
P106-090
The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the P106-090's 2,466 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 308.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the P106-090 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (P106-090). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+308% | 2,466 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+277% | 2.352 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+13% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+233% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+233% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The P106-090 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the P106-090 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (P106-090) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (P106-090). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the P106-090's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (P106-090). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 250mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+70% | 32.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the P106-090 launched at $389. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 36% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.3 (P106-090) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 541.3% better value. The P106-090 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-36% | $389 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+541% | 6.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 31 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #639 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













