
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+51.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 36.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 250mm, a 77mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌44.5% longer card at 250mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅+51.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 36.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 250mm, a 77mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌44.5% longer card at 250mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than P106-100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does P106-100 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and P106-100

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

P106-100
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the P106-100's 6,628 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 51.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+52% | 6,628 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+33% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+33% | 6.655 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+33% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+33% | 720 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The P106-100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the P106-100 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 250mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 88.4+58% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the P106-100 launched at $224. The P106-100 costs 10% less ($25 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 29.6 (P106-100) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 36.5% better value. The P106-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $224-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+36% | 29.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













