
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅317.9% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 708.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅317.9% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 708.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro's 5,000 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 101.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 16 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+101% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Celsius |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 64+1500% | 4 |
| TMUs | 160+3900% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 66.7+19% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 75.1% less ($751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 708% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 1999).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+708% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | NV10 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #137 | #900 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













