GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro 410

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+2256.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 1310.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro 410: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro 410 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (427 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

✅+2256.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 1310.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro 410: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro 410 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (427 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro 410?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 427 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro 410 is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013, 2256.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 67.1% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 2256.9% higher G3D Mark. Quadro 410 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro 410 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro 410 is 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 427 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Quadro 410 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
1080p
low	117 FPS	19 FPS
medium	105 FPS	15 FPS
high	91 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	14 FPS
medium	87 FPS	12 FPS
high	76 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	10 FPS
medium	49 FPS	8 FPS
high	41 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro 410

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
1080p
low	216 FPS	19 FPS
medium	181 FPS	15 FPS
high	148 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	14 FPS
medium	107 FPS	12 FPS
high	87 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	10 FPS
medium	51 FPS	8 FPS
high	49 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro 410

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
1080p
low	453 FPS	19 FPS
medium	362 FPS	15 FPS
high	302 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	14 FPS
medium	272 FPS	12 FPS
high	226 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	10 FPS
medium	181 FPS	8 FPS
high	151 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro 410

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
1080p
low	358 FPS	19 FPS
medium	302 FPS	15 FPS
high	260 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	14 FPS
medium	254 FPS	12 FPS
high	208 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	10 FPS
medium	133 FPS	8 FPS
high	123 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro 410

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro 410

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro 410's 427 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 2256.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
G3D Mark Score	10,064+2257%	427
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+122%	1152
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+445%	1.627 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+67%	96
L1 Cache	960 KB+900%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 410 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 410) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro 410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro 410
TDP	180W	100W-44%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	55.9+1200%	4.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro 410 launched at $149. The Quadro 410 costs 40.2% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.9 (Quadro 410) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1293.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).