
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+273.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 6504.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro 6000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro 6000 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro 6000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,692 vs 10,064).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1666.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro 6000
2010Why buy it
- ✅+273.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 6504.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro 6000: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro 6000 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,692 vs 10,064).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1666.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro 6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro 6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro 6000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro 6000
Quadro 6000
The Quadro 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 10 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro 6000's 2,692 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 273.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro 6000 uses Fermi, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 (Quadro 6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Quadro 6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+274% | 2,692 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+471% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+763% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+186% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.75 MB (Quadro 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro 6000's 204W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro 6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-12% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+323% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro 6000 launched at $4399. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 94.3% less ($4150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.6 (Quadro 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 6633.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-94% | $4399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+6633% | 0.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GF100 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | December 10 2010 |
| Ranking | #137 | #615 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













