GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro CX

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro CX

2008Core: 602 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +962.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 8431.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Quadro CX: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro CX is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 702.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro CX?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 947 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro CX is a 2008 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008, 962.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and a 16nm process instead of 55nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is about $1,750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 962.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 8431.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Quadro CX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Quadro CX is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,999 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
1080p
low117 FPS13 FPS
medium105 FPS9 FPS
high91 FPS6 FPS
ultra77 FPS3 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS9 FPS
medium87 FPS5 FPS
high76 FPS2 FPS
ultra67 FPS1 FPS
4K
low55 FPS4 FPS
medium49 FPS2 FPS
high41 FPS1 FPS
ultra37 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
1080p
low216 FPS30 FPS
medium181 FPS14 FPS
high148 FPS10 FPS
ultra113 FPS7 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS16 FPS
medium107 FPS7 FPS
high87 FPS5 FPS
ultra68 FPS4 FPS
4K
low62 FPS5 FPS
medium51 FPS3 FPS
high49 FPS2 FPS
ultra41 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
1080p
low453 FPS43 FPS
medium362 FPS34 FPS
high302 FPS28 FPS
ultra226 FPS21 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS32 FPS
medium272 FPS26 FPS
high226 FPS21 FPS
ultra170 FPS16 FPS
4K
low226 FPS21 FPS
medium181 FPS17 FPS
high151 FPS14 FPS
ultra113 FPS11 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
1080p
low358 FPS43 FPS
medium302 FPS34 FPS
high260 FPS28 FPS
ultra226 FPS21 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS8 FPS
medium254 FPS6 FPS
high208 FPS5 FPS
ultra170 FPS4 FPS
4K
low170 FPS5 FPS
medium133 FPS4 FPS
high123 FPS3 FPS
ultra102 FPS3 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro CX

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 962.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
G3D Mark Score
10,064+963%
947
Architecture
Pascal
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2560+1233%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+1819%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+167%
24
TMUs
160+150%
64
L2 Cache
2 MB+953%
0.19 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro CX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+953%
0.19 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
DirectX
12+8%
11.1 (10_0)
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.5+36%
3.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
None
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
PureVideo HD
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
TDP
180W
150W-17%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
55.9+787%
6.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 87.5% less ($1750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 7980% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro CX
MSRP
$249-88%
$1999
Performance per Dollar
40.4+7980%
0.5
Codename
GP104
GT200B
Release
May 27 2016
November 11 2008
Ranking
#137
#901