GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 2700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+1753.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 644.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro FX 2700: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro FX 2700 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (543 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

✅+1753.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 644.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro FX 2700: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro FX 2700 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (543 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro FX 2700?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 543 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro FX 2700 is a 2008 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008, 1753.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and a 16nm process instead of 55nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 149.0% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and you are getting 1753.4% higher G3D Mark. Quadro FX 2700 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro FX 2700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro FX 2700 is 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 543 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 2700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	117 FPS	24 FPS
medium	105 FPS	20 FPS
high	91 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	18 FPS
medium	87 FPS	15 FPS
high	76 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	11 FPS
medium	49 FPS	9 FPS
high	41 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro FX 2700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	216 FPS	24 FPS
medium	181 FPS	20 FPS
high	148 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	18 FPS
medium	107 FPS	15 FPS
high	87 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	12 FPS
medium	51 FPS	6 FPS
high	49 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro FX 2700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	453 FPS	24 FPS
medium	362 FPS	20 FPS
high	302 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	18 FPS
medium	272 FPS	15 FPS
high	226 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	12 FPS
medium	181 FPS	10 FPS
high	151 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	6 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro FX 2700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	358 FPS	24 FPS
medium	302 FPS	20 FPS
high	260 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	9 FPS
medium	254 FPS	7 FPS
high	208 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	6 FPS
medium	133 FPS	4 FPS
high	123 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro FX 2700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro FX 2700

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro FX 2700's 543 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 1753.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 2700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
G3D Mark Score	10,064+1753%	543
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2560+967%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+1326%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+100%	80
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro FX 2700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2700) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro FX 2700
TDP	180W-5%	189W
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	55.9+1828%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100. The Quadro FX 2700 costs 59.8% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 2700) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 648.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).