
GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 3800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 3800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 3800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅645.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3819.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Quadro FX 3800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Quadro FX 3800
2008Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 3800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro FX 3800's 824 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 1121.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 3800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3800). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+1121% | 824 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+967% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+1326% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3800 carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3800) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+500% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+20% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro FX 3800's 189W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3800). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-5% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+1170% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro FX 3800 launched at $799. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 68.8% cheaper ($550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 3940% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+3940% | 1.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GT200B |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #137 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















