GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 560

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 560

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 560 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • βœ…3508.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 10500.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • βœ…4700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 128 MB).
  • βœ…Quadro FX 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    20.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3508.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8728.1% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 114), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10500.8% (40.4 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro FX 560's 114 β€” the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 8728.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score
10,064+8728%
114
Architecture
Pascal
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2560+967%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+1326%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+100%
80
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 4700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) β€” the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+4700%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro FX 560
DirectX
12+33%
9_0c
Max Displays
4+100%
2
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W β€” a 4.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro FX 560
TDP
180W-5%
189W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
1mm
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
2
1-50%
Perf/Watt
55.9+9217%
0.6
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 16.7% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) β€” the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 10000% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro FX 560
MSRP
$249-17%
$299
Performance per Dollar
40.4+10000%
0.4
Codename
GP104
GT200B
Release
May 27 2016
November 11 2008
Ranking
#137
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.