GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro GP100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro GP100

2016Core: 1304 MHzBoost: 1442 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1963.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 235W, a 55W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 2711.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 30.6% higher power demand at 235W vs 180W.
  • 54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro GP100 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Yes. Quadro GP100 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 33.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data, 36.2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro GP100 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 36.2% more raw performance headroom and more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 6 GB. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro GP100 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro GP100 is about 2711.2% more expensive on MSRP at $7,000 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 33.3% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 36.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1060 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1060 is 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM, 10,064 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
1080p
low117 FPS190 FPS
medium105 FPS177 FPS
high91 FPS152 FPS
ultra77 FPS138 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS177 FPS
medium87 FPS149 FPS
high76 FPS118 FPS
ultra67 FPS108 FPS
4K
low55 FPS109 FPS
medium49 FPS91 FPS
high41 FPS67 FPS
ultra37 FPS61 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
1080p
low216 FPS313 FPS
medium181 FPS274 FPS
high148 FPS207 FPS
ultra113 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS212 FPS
medium107 FPS181 FPS
high87 FPS145 FPS
ultra68 FPS118 FPS
4K
low62 FPS108 FPS
medium51 FPS91 FPS
high49 FPS75 FPS
ultra41 FPS59 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
1080p
low453 FPS617 FPS
medium362 FPS494 FPS
high302 FPS411 FPS
ultra226 FPS308 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS463 FPS
medium272 FPS370 FPS
high226 FPS308 FPS
ultra170 FPS231 FPS
4K
low226 FPS308 FPS
medium181 FPS247 FPS
high151 FPS206 FPS
ultra113 FPS154 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
1080p
low358 FPS455 FPS
medium302 FPS417 FPS
high260 FPS334 FPS
ultra226 FPS286 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS365 FPS
medium254 FPS337 FPS
high208 FPS259 FPS
ultra170 FPS218 FPS
4K
low170 FPS234 FPS
medium133 FPS218 FPS
high123 FPS177 FPS
ultra102 FPS146 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro GP100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro GP100's 13,710 — the Quadro GP100 leads by 36.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
G3D Mark Score
10,064
13,710+36%
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560
3584+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
10.34 TFLOPS+17%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+20%
1442 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
160
224+40%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1.3 MB+38%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GP100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 433.3% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
16 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
1024 GB/s+433%
Bus Width
192-bit
4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 4th gen
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 26.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
TDP
180W-23%
235W
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
58.3+4%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 96.4% less ($6751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1920% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro GP100
MSRP
$249-96%
$7000
Performance per Dollar
40.4+1920%
2.0
Codename
GP104
GP100
Release
May 27 2016
October 1 2016
Ranking
#137
#178