
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro K6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅31.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,016 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2562.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 265mm, a 92mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2014.5% HIGHER MSRP$5,265 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅31.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,016 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2562.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 265mm, a 92mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2014.5% HIGHER MSRP$5,265 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro K6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro K6000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro K6000's 7,993 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 25.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 902 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+26% | 7,993 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2880+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+71% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+92% | 902 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+300% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 9.9% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 211 GB/s+10% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 265mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-20% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 265mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+57% | 35.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro K6000 launched at $5265. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95.3% less ($5016 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 2593.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-95% | $5265 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+2593% | 1.5 |
| Codename | GP104 | GK110B |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #137 | #318 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













