GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro K6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 31.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $5,016 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2562.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 265mm, a 92mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro K6000

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 2014.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,265 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro K6000?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 31.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 25.9% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2013, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013, 25.9% more raw performance headroom, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is about $5,016 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $5,265 MSRP, and you are getting 31.2% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 25.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 2562.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Quadro K6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Quadro K6000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $5,265 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
1080p
low117 FPS118 FPS
medium105 FPS101 FPS
high91 FPS86 FPS
ultra77 FPS58 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS96 FPS
medium87 FPS81 FPS
high76 FPS62 FPS
ultra67 FPS42 FPS
4K
low55 FPS38 FPS
medium49 FPS34 FPS
high41 FPS21 FPS
ultra37 FPS18 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
1080p
low216 FPS111 FPS
medium181 FPS89 FPS
high148 FPS72 FPS
ultra113 FPS52 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS74 FPS
medium107 FPS55 FPS
high87 FPS43 FPS
ultra68 FPS30 FPS
4K
low62 FPS33 FPS
medium51 FPS26 FPS
high49 FPS24 FPS
ultra41 FPS18 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
1080p
low453 FPS360 FPS
medium362 FPS288 FPS
high302 FPS240 FPS
ultra226 FPS180 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS270 FPS
medium272 FPS216 FPS
high226 FPS180 FPS
ultra170 FPS135 FPS
4K
low226 FPS180 FPS
medium181 FPS144 FPS
high151 FPS120 FPS
ultra113 FPS90 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
1080p
low358 FPS213 FPS
medium302 FPS183 FPS
high260 FPS148 FPS
ultra226 FPS122 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS163 FPS
medium254 FPS141 FPS
high208 FPS109 FPS
ultra170 FPS86 FPS
4K
low170 FPS92 FPS
medium133 FPS72 FPS
high123 FPS58 FPS
ultra102 FPS43 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro K6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro K6000's 7,993 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 25.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 902 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
G3D Mark Score
10,064+26%
7,993
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
2880+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+71%
5.196 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+92%
902 MHz
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
160
240+50%
L1 Cache
960 KB+300%
240 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 9.9% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
12 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
211 GB/s+10%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
DirectX
12+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 265mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
TDP
180W-20%
225W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
265mm
Height
111mm
110mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+57%
35.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro K6000 launched at $5265. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95.3% less ($5016 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 2593.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro K6000
MSRP
$249-95%
$5265
Performance per Dollar
40.4+2593%
1.5
Codename
GP104
GK110B
Release
May 27 2016
July 23 2013
Ranking
#137
#318