GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M3000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅126.6% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M3000M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M3000M is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Quadro M3000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Quadro M3000M

2015

Why buy it

✅126.6% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro M3000M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro M3000M is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro M3000M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1060 averages 126.6% more FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 5,574 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro M3000M is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015, 80.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 126.6% more estimated average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data and 80.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M3000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M3000M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Quadro M3000M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	117 FPS	82 FPS
medium	105 FPS	70 FPS
high	91 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	72 FPS
medium	87 FPS	62 FPS
high	76 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	25 FPS
medium	49 FPS	24 FPS
high	41 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M3000M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	216 FPS	157 FPS
medium	181 FPS	125 FPS
high	148 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	109 FPS
medium	107 FPS	85 FPS
high	87 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	53 FPS
medium	51 FPS	44 FPS
high	49 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M3000M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	453 FPS	251 FPS
medium	362 FPS	201 FPS
high	302 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	188 FPS
medium	272 FPS	150 FPS
high	226 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	125 FPS
medium	181 FPS	100 FPS
high	151 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M3000M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
1080p
low	358 FPS	157 FPS
medium	302 FPS	128 FPS
high	260 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	114 FPS
medium	254 FPS	95 FPS
high	208 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	65 FPS
medium	133 FPS	52 FPS
high	123 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M3000M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro M3000M

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro M3000M's 5,574 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 80.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
G3D Mark Score	10,064+81%	5,574
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+150%	1,024
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+313%	2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+150%	64
L1 Cache	960 KB+150%	384 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M3000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M3000M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M3000M
TDP	180W	75W-58%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	55.9	74.3+33%