
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+50.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $542 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 378.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 10,064).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌217.7% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+50.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $542 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 378.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 10,064).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌217.7% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro M4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro M4000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro M4000's 6,679 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 50.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+51% | 6,679 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+255% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+71% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+100% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M4000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 9.9% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 211 GB/s+10% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 66.8+19% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 68.5% less ($542 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 381% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $791 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+381% | 8.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













