GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M4000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 47.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $542 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
  • Delivers 378.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
  • Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Quadro M4000

2015

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 217.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $791 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 50.7% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 6,679), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $542 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $791, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 378.7% (40.4 vs 8.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro M4000's 6,679 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 50.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1013 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M4000
G3D Mark Score
10,064+51%
6,679
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+100%
1,280
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+255%
2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+71%
1013 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160+100%
80
L1 Cache
960 KB+100%
480 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000 carries 8 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 9.9% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M4000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
211 GB/s+10%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M4000
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M4000
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
1st Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M4000
TDP
180W
100W-44%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
66.8+19%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 68.5% cheaper ($542 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 381% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M4000
MSRP
$249-69%
$791
Performance per Dollar
40.4+381%
8.4
Codename
GP104
GM204
Release
May 27 2016
August 18 2015
Ranking
#137
#392

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.