GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

2015Core: 988 MHzBoost: 1114 MHz

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1616.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

  • 3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1907.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
  • 54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 16.9% in PassMark G3D (11,769 vs 10,064), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $4,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1616.8% (40.4 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro M6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro M6000's 11,769 — the Quadro M6000 leads by 16.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M6000
G3D Mark Score
10,064
11,769+17%
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
3072+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+30%
6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+56%
1114 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
160
192+20%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1.1 MB+17%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 carries 12 GB. Quadro M6000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 65.1% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 384-bit on the Quadro M6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M6000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
12 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
317 GB/s+65%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M6000
DirectX
12
12/1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M6000
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M6000
TDP
180W-28%
250W
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+19%
47.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 95% cheaper ($4750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1583.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro M6000
MSRP
$249-95%
$4999
Performance per Dollar
40.4+1583%
2.4
Codename
GP104
GM200
Release
May 27 2016
March 21 2015
Ranking
#137
#228

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.