G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1638% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅14.3% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1907.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Quadro M6000 24GB

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1638% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅14.3% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M6000 24GB across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1907.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M6000 24GB better than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Quadro M6000 24GB is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 14.3% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data, 15.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 24 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro M6000 24GB is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro M6000 24GB is about 1907.6% more expensive on MSRP at $4,999 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 14.3% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data and 15.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1060 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than Quadro M6000 24GB?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (180W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro M6000 24GB. The trade-off is that Quadro M6000 24GB currently gives you 15.5% higher G3D Mark and 14.3% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 1060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 24GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	117 FPS	160 FPS
medium	105 FPS	142 FPS
high	91 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	140 FPS
medium	87 FPS	120 FPS
high	76 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	61 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	67 FPS
medium	49 FPS	58 FPS
high	41 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	216 FPS	191 FPS
medium	181 FPS	168 FPS
high	148 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	131 FPS
medium	107 FPS	106 FPS
high	87 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	62 FPS
medium	51 FPS	52 FPS
high	49 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	453 FPS	523 FPS
medium	362 FPS	418 FPS
high	302 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	392 FPS
medium	272 FPS	314 FPS
high	226 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	262 FPS
medium	181 FPS	209 FPS
high	151 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	131 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
1080p
low	358 FPS	233 FPS
medium	302 FPS	200 FPS
high	260 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	179 FPS
medium	254 FPS	157 FPS
high	208 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	102 FPS
medium	133 FPS	82 FPS
high	123 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro M6000 24GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 11,625 — the Quadro M6000 24GB leads by 15.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
G3D Mark Score	10,064	11,625+16%
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560	3072+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+30%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+56%	1114 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	160	256+60%
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	1.1 MB+17%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 65.1% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	24 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	317 GB/s+65%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
DirectX	12	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro M6000 24GB
TDP	180W-28%	250W
Recommended PSU	400W-20%	500W
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	267mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	55.9+20%	46.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95% less ($4750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1656.5% better value.