
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 201mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌16.2% longer card at 201mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 201mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌16.2% longer card at 201mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro P2200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P2200 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P2200

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 7.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+7% | 9,386 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+132% | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+16% | 1493 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+100% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 has 5 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+20% | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 201mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 125.1+124% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 42% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 84.5% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-42% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+84% | 21.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #281 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













