
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+17.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅+17.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro P3200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P3200 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P3200

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P3200's 8,578 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 17.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+17% | 8,578 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+60% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+12% | 1543 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+43% | 672 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 114.4+105% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 50.2% less ($251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 17.2 (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 134.9% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+135% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #137 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













