GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P3200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P3200

2018Core: 1328 MHzBoost: 1543 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +17.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 135.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200

2018

Why buy it

  • Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
  • Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 100.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro P3200?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 17.3% higher PassMark G3D performance and 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2018, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P3200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is about $251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 17.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 135.6%. Quadro P3200 is the newer 2018 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 180W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Quadro P3200 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Yes. Quadro P3200 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 17.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 135.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
1080p
low117 FPS93 FPS
medium105 FPS84 FPS
high91 FPS71 FPS
ultra77 FPS58 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS87 FPS
medium87 FPS76 FPS
high76 FPS61 FPS
ultra67 FPS50 FPS
4K
low55 FPS40 FPS
medium49 FPS37 FPS
high41 FPS26 FPS
ultra37 FPS23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
1080p
low216 FPS227 FPS
medium181 FPS190 FPS
high148 FPS143 FPS
ultra113 FPS114 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS162 FPS
medium107 FPS136 FPS
high87 FPS109 FPS
ultra68 FPS86 FPS
4K
low62 FPS94 FPS
medium51 FPS77 FPS
high49 FPS64 FPS
ultra41 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
1080p
low453 FPS386 FPS
medium362 FPS309 FPS
high302 FPS257 FPS
ultra226 FPS193 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS279 FPS
medium272 FPS232 FPS
high226 FPS193 FPS
ultra170 FPS145 FPS
4K
low226 FPS182 FPS
medium181 FPS154 FPS
high151 FPS110 FPS
ultra113 FPS75 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
1080p
low358 FPS287 FPS
medium302 FPS221 FPS
high260 FPS191 FPS
ultra226 FPS162 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS222 FPS
medium254 FPS171 FPS
high208 FPS143 FPS
ultra170 FPS117 FPS
4K
low170 FPS110 FPS
medium133 FPS83 FPS
high123 FPS74 FPS
ultra102 FPS56 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P3200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200

The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P3200's 8,578 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 17.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1543 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
G3D Mark Score
10,064+17%
8,578
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560+43%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+60%
5.53 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+12%
1543 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160+43%
112
L1 Cache
960 KB+43%
672 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.265,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
TDP
180W
75W-58%
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
55.9
114.4+105%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 50.2% less ($251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 17.2 (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 134.9% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P3200
MSRP
$249-50%
$500
Performance per Dollar
40.4+135%
17.2
Codename
GP104
GP104
Release
May 27 2016
February 21 2018
Ranking
#137
#304