
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅9.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $566 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,431).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅+13.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌227.3% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅9.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $566 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+13.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,431).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌227.3% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P4000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than Quadro P4000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P4000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P4000's 11,431 — the Quadro P4000 leads by 13.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,431+14% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+67% | 5.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+17% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+43% | 672 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro P4000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 52.6% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 105W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 108.9+95% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P4000 launched at $815. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 69.4% less ($566 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 14.0 (Quadro P4000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 188.6% better value. The Quadro P4000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $815 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+189% | 14.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #239 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













