GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅37.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Quadro P4200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Quadro P4200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅37.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro P4200 Max-Q?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 37.8% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data, 29% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2018, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 37.8% more estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data and 29.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the newer 2018 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (100W vs 180W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro P4200 Max-Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Quadro P4200 Max-Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (100W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 29.0% higher G3D Mark and 37.8% more estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Quadro P4200 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
1080p
low	117 FPS	93 FPS
medium	105 FPS	81 FPS
high	91 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	46 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	78 FPS
medium	87 FPS	69 FPS
high	76 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	28 FPS
medium	49 FPS	26 FPS
high	41 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
1080p
low	216 FPS	221 FPS
medium	181 FPS	187 FPS
high	148 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	117 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	161 FPS
medium	107 FPS	135 FPS
high	87 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	94 FPS
medium	51 FPS	78 FPS
high	49 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
1080p
low	453 FPS	351 FPS
medium	362 FPS	281 FPS
high	302 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	263 FPS
medium	272 FPS	211 FPS
high	226 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	176 FPS
medium	181 FPS	140 FPS
high	151 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	88 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro P4200 Max-Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
1080p
low	358 FPS	178 FPS
medium	302 FPS	145 FPS
high	260 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	127 FPS
medium	254 FPS	104 FPS
high	208 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	71 FPS
medium	133 FPS	58 FPS
high	123 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P4200 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P4200 Max-Q

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 7,800 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 29%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	10,064+29%	7,800
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	16 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2560+11%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+30%	6.82 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+17%	1480 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+11%	144
L1 Cache	960 KB+11%	864 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.