
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 693.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,728).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅+26.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 693.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+26.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,728).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 73 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 104 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P5000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P5000's 12,728 — the Quadro P5000 leads by 26.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,728+26% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 50% advantage for the Quadro P5000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 70.7+26% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 90% less ($2250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 692.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+692% | 5.1 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













