GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P5200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P5200

2018Core: 1556 MHzBoost: 1746 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 11.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 73.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,650).
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

  • +15.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P5200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 100.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P5200 instead at 11,650 vs 10,064, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 73.5% (40.4 vs 23.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P5200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P5200's 11,650 — the Quadro P5200 leads by 15.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P5200
G3D Mark Score
10,064
11,650+16%
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
8.94 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1746 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
160
L1 Cache
960 KB
960 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P5200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 256-bit on the Quadro P5200.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P5200
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P5200
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P5200
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 5.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P5200
TDP
180W
100W-44%
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
116.5+108%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 50.2% cheaper ($251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 73.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P5200 (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P5200
MSRP
$249-50%
$500
Performance per Dollar
40.4+73%
23.3
Codename
GP104
GP104
Release
May 27 2016
February 21 2018
Ranking
#137
#230

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.