
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅16.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,308).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅+22.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅16.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅+22.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,308).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5200 Max-Q better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P5200 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 12,308 — the Quadro P5200 Max-Q leads by 22.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1569 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,308+22% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+10% | 8.033 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+10% | 1569 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 123.1+120% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #137 | #217 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













