
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1463.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅39.7% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2309.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1463.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅39.7% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2309.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P6000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P6000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P6000's 15,512 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 54.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 15,512+54% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+42% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+5% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.4 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 290.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 125% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 23.438 GB+291% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 432 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 62.0+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95.8% less ($5750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1453.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $5999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1454% | 2.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













