GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1463.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

  • 39.7% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 2309.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
  • 54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P6000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Yes. Quadro P6000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 39.7% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data, 54.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 23 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P6000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 54.1% more raw performance headroom and more VRAM at 23 GB instead of 6 GB. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro P6000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P6000 is about 2309.2% more expensive on MSRP at $5,999 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 39.7% more estimated average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data and 54.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1060 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1060 is 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM, 10,064 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
1080p
low117 FPS197 FPS
medium105 FPS183 FPS
high91 FPS159 FPS
ultra77 FPS145 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS182 FPS
medium87 FPS153 FPS
high76 FPS125 FPS
ultra67 FPS116 FPS
4K
low55 FPS114 FPS
medium49 FPS96 FPS
high41 FPS73 FPS
ultra37 FPS67 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
1080p
low216 FPS355 FPS
medium181 FPS306 FPS
high148 FPS227 FPS
ultra113 FPS182 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS225 FPS
medium107 FPS193 FPS
high87 FPS156 FPS
ultra68 FPS125 FPS
4K
low62 FPS109 FPS
medium51 FPS91 FPS
high49 FPS76 FPS
ultra41 FPS58 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
1080p
low453 FPS698 FPS
medium362 FPS558 FPS
high302 FPS465 FPS
ultra226 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS524 FPS
medium272 FPS419 FPS
high226 FPS349 FPS
ultra170 FPS262 FPS
4K
low226 FPS349 FPS
medium181 FPS279 FPS
high151 FPS233 FPS
ultra113 FPS175 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
1080p
low358 FPS520 FPS
medium302 FPS451 FPS
high260 FPS387 FPS
ultra226 FPS319 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS422 FPS
medium254 FPS367 FPS
high208 FPS300 FPS
ultra170 FPS245 FPS
4K
low170 FPS260 FPS
medium133 FPS247 FPS
high123 FPS215 FPS
ultra102 FPS175 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P6000's 15,512 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 54.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
G3D Mark Score
10,064
15,512+54%
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560
3840+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS+42%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+5%
1645 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
160
240+50%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1.4 MB+49%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 290.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 125% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
23.438 GB+291%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
432 GB/s+125%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
TDP
180W-28%
250W
Recommended PSU
400W-38%
650W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
62.0+11%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95.8% less ($5750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1453.8% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P6000
MSRP
$249-96%
$5999
Performance per Dollar
40.4+1454%
2.6
Codename
GP104
GP102
Release
May 27 2016
October 1 2016
Ranking
#137
#141