
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅14.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 123.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌141% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅14.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 123.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌141% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 390 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 10,829 — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) leads by 7.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1380 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 10,829+8% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+40% | 6.359 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+26% | 1380 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.3 MB+145% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 80W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 80W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 135.4+142% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) launched at $600. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 58.5% less ($351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 18.0 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 124.4% better value. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-59% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+124% | 18.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #261 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













