
GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $651 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌63.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅22.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 180W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌261.4% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 197.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 29,964+198% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+11% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+11% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1060 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) carries 8 GB. Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 48.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 110W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 272.4+387% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 72.3% cheaper ($651 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 21.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-72% | $900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+21% | 33.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #201 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















