
GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro RTX 6000
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,051 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1323.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 260W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅91.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro RTX 6000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌2430.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 17,887 — the Quadro RTX 6000 leads by 77.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 17,887+78% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1770 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 4.5 MB+379% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 carries 24 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 300% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 768 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 36.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-31% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 68.8+23% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 96% cheaper ($6051 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1342.9% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 6000 (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1343% | 2.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #137 | #99 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















