
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅105.7% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
- ❌10.9% longer card at 173mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 173mm, a 17mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌60.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅105.7% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 173mm, a 17mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
- ❌10.9% longer card at 173mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌60.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro T1000 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro T1000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro T1000's 6,505 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 54.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+55% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+19% | 1455 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 113% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 130.1+133% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 37.8% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 147.9% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+148% | 16.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













