GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro T2000

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Quadro T2000

2010Core: 625 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro T2000 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1060

6 GB 180

10,064

+38.3%

GeForce GTX 680

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Quadro T2000

4 GB 62

7,279

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro T2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro T2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅472.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 233.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌190.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 62W.

Quadro T2000

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 180W, a 118W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
141% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 472.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 38.3% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 7,279), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $351 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 233.2% (40.4 vs 12.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro T2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro T2000's 7,279 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 38.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro T2000
G3D Mark Score	10,064+38%	7,279
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Process Node	16 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2560+1233%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+1749%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+400%	32
L1 Cache	960 KB+275%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro T2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro T2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro T2000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro T2000
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro T2000
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 97.5% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro T2000
TDP	180W	62W-66%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	55.9	117.4+110%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 58.5% cheaper ($351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 233.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro T2000
MSRP	$249-59%	$600
Performance per Dollar	40.4+234%	12.1
Codename	GP104	GF106
Release	May 27 2016	December 24 2010
Ranking	#137	#902

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search Quadro T2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.