GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon 630

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅502.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 156.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Radeon 630

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon 630

2019

Why buy it

✅502.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 156.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon 630?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1060 averages 502.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 1,575 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 630 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 630 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 149.0% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and you are getting 502.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 539.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 630 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon 630 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon 630 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $100 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 539.0% higher G3D Mark and 502.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 156.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon 630 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
1080p
low	117 FPS	37 FPS
medium	105 FPS	22 FPS
high	91 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	9 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	24 FPS
medium	87 FPS	14 FPS
high	76 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	9 FPS
medium	49 FPS	6 FPS
high	41 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon 630

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
1080p
low	216 FPS	71 FPS
medium	181 FPS	46 FPS
high	148 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	21 FPS
medium	107 FPS	15 FPS
high	87 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	6 FPS
medium	51 FPS	4 FPS
high	49 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon 630

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
1080p
low	453 FPS	71 FPS
medium	362 FPS	57 FPS
high	302 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	53 FPS
medium	272 FPS	43 FPS
high	226 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	35 FPS
medium	181 FPS	28 FPS
high	151 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon 630

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
1080p
low	358 FPS	69 FPS
medium	302 FPS	57 FPS
high	260 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	53 FPS
medium	254 FPS	43 FPS
high	208 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	35 FPS
medium	133 FPS	28 FPS
high	123 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon 630

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon 630

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon 630's 1,575 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 539%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
G3D Mark Score	10,064+539%	1,575
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+400%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+612%	1.247 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+42%	1218 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+400%	32
L1 Cache	960 KB+650%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 630 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 630) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 113% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon 630
TDP	180W	50W-72%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	55.9+77%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100. The Radeon 630 costs 59.8% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 15.8 (Radeon 630) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 155.7% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).