
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon 680M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+162.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅+162.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,836 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon 680M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon 680M

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon 680M's 3,836 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 162.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+162% | 3,836 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+163% | 3.379 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2200 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+233% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+275% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 3.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 113% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 76.7+37% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #512 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













