
GeForce GTX 1060

RADEON 9550
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RADEON 9550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RADEON 9550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RADEON 9550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅10724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 14796.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅RADEON 9550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
RADEON 9550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RADEON 9550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RADEON 9550
The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RADEON 9550's 35 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 28654.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RADEON 9550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 (RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+28654% | 35 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+400% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+633% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+46% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+400% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+650% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9550 carries 256 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9550. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (RADEON 9550) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+2300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RADEON 9550's 50W — a 113% difference. The RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (RADEON 9550). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+7886% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the RADEON 9550 launched at $129. On MSRP, RADEON 9550 was 48.2% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9550) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 13366.7% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9550 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $129-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+13367% | 0.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | Lexa |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















