GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon AI PRO R9700

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon AI PRO R9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,050 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 83.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025

Why buy it

  • 67.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 421.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
  • 54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 67.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 184.1% in PassMark G3D (28,589 vs 10,064), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 32 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 16nm, and 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,050 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $1,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 83.6% (40.4 vs 22.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1440p and 4K headroom, Radeon AI PRO R9700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon AI PRO R9700

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 184.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon AI PRO R9700
G3D Mark Score
10,064
28,589+184%
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 4.0
Process Node
16 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
2560
4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+439%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
2920 MHz+68%
ROPs
64
128+100%
TMUs
160
256+60%
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon AI PRO R9700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 carries 32 GB. Radeon AI PRO R9700 gives you 433.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 256-bit on the Radeon AI PRO R9700. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon AI PRO R9700
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
32 GB+433%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon AI PRO R9700
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon AI PRO R9700
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCN 5.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
VCN 5.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon AI PRO R9700
TDP
180W-40%
300W
Recommended PSU
400W-38%
650W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
95.3+70%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 80.8% cheaper ($1050 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 83.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon AI PRO R9700 (2025 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP
$249-81%
$1299
Performance per Dollar
40.4+84%
22.0
Codename
GP104
Navi 48
Release
May 27 2016
July 23 2025
Ranking
#137
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.