
GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon HD 3850 AGP
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- β 1018.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 1116.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- β 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
- β Radeon HD 3850 AGP is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
- β Measures 173mm instead of 230mm, a 57mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- β2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- β38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $119 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- β Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- β32.9% longer card at 230mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 3850 AGP
The Radeon HD 3850 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon HD 3850 AGP's 432 β the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 2229.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 3850 AGP uses GCN 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+2230% | 432 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+404% | 1.761 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+275% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3850 AGP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3850 AGP carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 AGP. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3850 AGP) β the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+500% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5+36% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon HD 3850 AGP's 130W β a 32.3% difference. The Radeon HD 3850 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 230mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 130W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 230mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | β | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+1594% | 3.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon HD 3850 AGP launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3850 AGP was 47.8% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.3 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP) β the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1124.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon HD 3850 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $130-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1124% | 3.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | Pitcairn |
| Release | May 27 2016 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #137 | #503 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















