GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 4810

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4810

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 4810 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 4810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 4810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 944.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 265.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Radeon HD 4810 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 246mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon HD 4810

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $179 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 42.2% longer card at 246mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 944.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1198.6% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 775), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $179 more expensive on MSRP at $249 vs $70, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 265.1% (40.4 vs 11.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon HD 4810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon HD 4810

The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon HD 4810's 775 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 1198.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 4810 uses TeraScale, both on 16 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4810). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon HD 4810
G3D Mark Score
10,064+1199%
775
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale
Process Node
16 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2560+220%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+552%
1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
160+300%
40
L1 Cache
960 KB+500%
160 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4810 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon HD 4810
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4810 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4810. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4810) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon HD 4810
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon HD 4810
DirectX
12+19%
10.1
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.5+36%
3.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (Radeon HD 4810). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4810).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon HD 4810
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
None
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon HD 4810's 190W — a 5.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4810). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 246mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon HD 4810
TDP
180W-5%
190W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
173mm
246mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
55.9+1263%
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4810 was 71.9% cheaper ($179 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.1 (Radeon HD 4810) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 264% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon HD 4810
MSRP
$249
$70-72%
Performance per Dollar
40.4+264%
11.1
Codename
GP104
RV790
Release
May 27 2016
April 2 2009
Ranking
#137
#762

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.