
GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon IGP 320M
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon IGP 320M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅10724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌111.8% higher power demand at 180W vs 85W.
Radeon IGP 320M
2019Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon IGP 320M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 180W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 251500%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+251500% | 4 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+177% | 3.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+39% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 320M carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 71.7% difference. The Radeon IGP 320M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 85W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon IGP 320M (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #403 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















