
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 455
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+223.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 455: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 455 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Radeon Pro 455
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,113 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro 455
2016Why buy it
- ✅+223.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 455: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 455 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,113 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro 455?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 455 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro 455

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro 455
Radeon Pro 455
The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro 455's 3,113 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 223.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 455 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 455). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+223% | 3,113 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+576% | 1.313 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+233% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+400% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 455 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 455 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 455). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro 455's 35W — a 134.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 455). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 35W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 88.9+59% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 455 costs 100+% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon Pro 455 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP104 | Baffin |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #577 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













