GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+71.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌111.8% higher power demand at 180W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 85W instead of 180W, a 95W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,853 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅+71.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 85W instead of 180W, a 95W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌111.8% higher power demand at 180W vs 85W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,853 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro 5300M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 71.9% higher PassMark G3D performance and 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5300M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 71.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon Pro 5300M is the newer 2019 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (85W vs 180W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon Pro 5300M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5300M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (85W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 71.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	117 FPS	98 FPS
medium	105 FPS	85 FPS
high	91 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	88 FPS
medium	87 FPS	76 FPS
high	76 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	31 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	28 FPS
medium	49 FPS	27 FPS
high	41 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	216 FPS	125 FPS
medium	181 FPS	87 FPS
high	148 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	82 FPS
medium	107 FPS	49 FPS
high	87 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	38 FPS
medium	51 FPS	25 FPS
high	49 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	453 FPS	263 FPS
medium	362 FPS	211 FPS
high	302 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	198 FPS
medium	272 FPS	158 FPS
high	226 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	99 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	132 FPS
medium	181 FPS	105 FPS
high	151 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	358 FPS	141 FPS
medium	302 FPS	113 FPS
high	260 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	80 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	103 FPS
medium	254 FPS	85 FPS
high	208 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	59 FPS
medium	133 FPS	47 FPS
high	123 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 5,853 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 71.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score	10,064+72%	5,853
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+100%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+177%	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+39%	1250 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+100%	80
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro 5300M
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 71.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.